<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>qblog &#187; Firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qblog.remarqs.net/category/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qblog.remarqs.net</link>
	<description>the blog of »Q«</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 23:14:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>kde4 and a blockage for arch blogging</title>
		<link>http://qblog.remarqs.net/2009/06/06/kde4-and-a-blockage-for-arch-blogging/</link>
		<comments>http://qblog.remarqs.net/2009/06/06/kde4-and-a-blockage-for-arch-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 05:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>»Q«</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GNU/Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qblog.remarqs.net/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I haven&#8217;t really hit any snags with installing Arch, which leaves me with little to blog about the process. I&#8217;m slowly copying over stuff from my laptop and my desktop Slackware install, which is tedious.  For bringing over Firefox stuff, the extensions FEBE, CLEO, and OPIE have been extremely helpful. I&#8217;ve installed The Chakra Project&#8216;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t really hit any snags with installing Arch, which leaves me with little to blog about the process.  I&#8217;m slowly copying over stuff from my laptop and my desktop Slackware install, which is tedious.  For bringing over Firefox stuff, the extensions <a title="home page for FEBE, &amp;c." href="http://customsoftwareconsult.com/extensions/">FEBE, CLEO, and OPIE</a> have been extremely helpful.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve installed <a title="Chakra's web site" href="http://chakra-project.org/">The Chakra Project</a>&#8216;s KDEmod version of KDE4. KDEmod has split packages for KDE, much like <a title="Gentoo's split ebuilds for KDE" href="http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/kde/kde-split-ebuilds.xml">Gentoo does</a>.  This appeals to be because there&#8217;s a lot of KDE stuff I never use and installing fewer packages means less downloading and upgrading on this dial-up machine.  I&#8217;ve installed the minimal set of packages to get a KDE desktop and I&#8217;m slowly adding stuff as I see what I want.  This is my first real experience with KDE4, so figuring out what it could do and then what I should install if I want to make it do that is problematic.  I&#8217;ve grabbed a Chakra livecd with the full KDE4 to help me figure it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://qblog.remarqs.net/2009/06/06/kde4-and-a-blockage-for-arch-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>travelocity loses a customer</title>
		<link>http://qblog.remarqs.net/2007/08/04/travelocity-loses-a-customer/</link>
		<comments>http://qblog.remarqs.net/2007/08/04/travelocity-loses-a-customer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>»Q«</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qblog.remarqs.net/2007/08/04/travelocity-loses-a-customer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m not very savvy when it comes to finding the best deals on air travel. I needed to book a flight, and my plan was to try Expedia, Travelocity, and Orbitz to see who&#8217;d give me the best deal and just take that. Expedia was down for maintenance and said it would be back tomorrow; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://qblog.remarqs.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/travelostupidity.png" title="travelocity screenshot" alt="travelocity screenshot" align="left" border="2" height="589" hspace="10" vspace="10" width="302" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not very savvy when it comes to finding the best deals on air travel.  I needed to book a flight, and my plan was to try <a href="http://www.expedia.com/" title="expedia, which was down">Expedia</a>, <a href="http://www.travelocity.com/" title="stupid online business site">Travelocity</a>, and <a href="http://www.orbitz.com/" title="Orbitz, which got my business">Orbitz</a> to see who&#8217;d give me the best deal and just take that.  Expedia was down for maintenance and said it would be back tomorrow;  I guess they have to retool sometime, but I&#8217;m not waiting until tomorrow.</p>
<p>Travelocity&#8217;s site is <abbr title="fouled up beyond all recognition">FUBAR</abbr> in my browser, <a href="http://remarqs.net/firefox/" title="some Fx stuff I have on the intertubes">Firefox</a>.  Ok, maybe not that bad, but bad enough to make it unusable by me.  I use a <a href="http://www.samsung.com/us/consumer/detail/detail.do?group=computersperipherals&amp;type=monitors&amp;subtype=lcd&amp;model_cd=LS20BRDBSQ/XAA" title="the Samsung SyncMaster 204B">20-inch monitor</a>, which I love, at its native 1600&#215;1200 resolution.  If I let websites decide what font size they&#8217;d like me to see, I&#8217;d spend a lot of time squinting at the screen.  I <a href="http://kb.mozillazine.org/Accessibility_features_of_Firefox#Setting_a_minimum_font_size" title="font settings for Fx">set a minimum font size</a> to avoid any such squinting.  At Travelocity, this causes the options  for flight/hotel/automobile to be covered up by the navigation menu.  Also, their &#8220;From&#8221; and &#8220;To&#8221; input boxes seem to be covering up some important options.</p>
<p>This sucks for them, since I just used Orbitz instead.  Sure, I could have used another browser, or another Firefox profile, or just temporarily changed my usual settings.  But with Orbitz one click away, I didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>After buying my tickets from Orbitz, I had a look at the Travelocity page in <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/inspector/" title="Mozilla DOM Inspector">the DOM Inspector</a>.  Their not-so-careful web designer would like the font size of the navigation menu to be 11.7 px, whereas with my settings it&#8217;s 14 px.  That made the menu wrap, and with their line-height setting and some padding, it pushed the &#8220;About Travelocity&#8221; link down over the top of the options I most needed to get at.</p>
<p>14 px isn&#8217;t exactly an insanely large font size.  I wonder how much business they&#8217;ve lost because of their misconception that the web is a one-size-fits-all environment.  Firefox is not the only browser which gives the user decent control — <a href="http://konqueror.kde.org/" title="free browser">Konqueror</a>, <a href="http://www.opera.com/" title="proprietary browser">Opera</a>, and <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/" title="proprietary browser">Safari</a> all let their users choose a minimum font size, and I&#8217;m sure these are not the only ones.</p>
<p>At Orbitz, I had to click through a great lot of pages to get my purchase taken care of.  Every page displayed just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://qblog.remarqs.net/2007/08/04/travelocity-loses-a-customer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>forum avatars (re)considered evil</title>
		<link>http://qblog.remarqs.net/2007/07/28/forum-avatars-reconsidered-evil/</link>
		<comments>http://qblog.remarqs.net/2007/07/28/forum-avatars-reconsidered-evil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>»Q«</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gentoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qblog.remarqs.net/2007/07/28/forum-avatars-reconsidered-evil/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite my hatred of web forums, there are some I need to visit fairly regularly. For example, while I generally use Gentoo&#8217;s user mailing list if I have a question, searching the Gentoo forums can turn up a lot of good info. It also turns up a lot of avatars I don&#8217;t want to see, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite my <a title="I really do hate them" href="http://qblog.remarqs.net/2007/07/24/why-i-hate-web-forums/">hatred</a> of web forums, there are some I need to visit fairly regularly.  For example, while I generally use <a title="info about Gentoo lists" href="http://qblog.remarqs.net/wp-admin/Gentoo%27s%20user%20mailing%20list">Gentoo&#8217;s user mailing list</a> if I have a question, searching <a title="portal to the forums" href="http://forums.gentoo.org/">the Gentoo forums</a> can turn up a lot of good info.  It also turns up a lot of <a title="wikipedia on avatar icons" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar_%28icon%29">avatars</a> I don&#8217;t want to see, including animated ones.</p>
<p>The title of this post is a bit misleading.  I&#8217;m not going to consider these avatars and what&#8217;s so annoying about them.  If you like them, fine, and keep looking at them.  Did I mention I hate them, though?  Well, I do.  So I gave a little thought about how to best get rid of them.  There are many ways, from just turning off images while I browse forums to writing <a title="CSS at Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CSS">css</a> to hide them.  But the quickest way I happened to have at my fingertips was to use <a title="Wladimir Palant's site" href="http://adblockplus.org/en/">Adblock Plus</a>, one of <a title="some of my fave extensions" href="http://remarqs.net/firefox/faves.htm">my favorite Firefox extensions</a>.</p>
<p>A quick look at the Gentoo forums showed that all the avatars live in the same directory on the Gentoo site itself, which makes blocking them extra super easy. (That&#8217;s right, I said extra super easy.)  I went to a forum page, opened Adblock Plus&#8217; list of blockable items and clicked one of the avatar <a title="wikipedia will explain again" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Resource_Identifier">URI</a>s, then changed the filename to a nice generic wildcard asterisk.</p>
<p><code>http://forums.gentoo.org/images/avatars/*</code></p>
<p>So now I&#8217;ll never see the cute little pictures while I read about Gentoo.  Of course, I&#8217;d need to do something similar for any forums I want to read, but it&#8217;s simple enough that I almost don&#8217;t mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://qblog.remarqs.net/2007/07/28/forum-avatars-reconsidered-evil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
